The UK government looks set to approve controversial geoengineering experiments that include efforts to dim the Sun.
Aria (Advanced Research and Invention Agency), the government body that funds technology projects, has set aside £50 million for the task, and specific, small-scale trials will be announced within a few weeks, said The Telegraph.
As the effects of global warming continue to intensify, “so has interest in some sort of back-up plan”, said The New York Times. That’s why some scientists are doubling down on geoengineering projects – climate intervention tactics that range from “sucking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere” to brightening clouds.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week’s Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘Treating the symptoms’
Most geoengineering trials aim to prevent excessive sunlight from reaching the Earth’s surface. This is often done by either “launching clouds of reflective particles into the atmosphere” or using “seawater sprays to make clouds brighter”, said The Guardian.
If trials like Aria’s are successful, and the techniques are adopted on a larger scale, it could “temporarily reduce surface temperatures and the harm the climate crisis is causing”. This would allow more time to cut worldwide carbon emissions. And there is preliminary, real-world evidence that geoengineering might work.
As ships cross oceans, their exhaust brightens the clouds above them, so sunlight reflects more effectively, said The New York Times. That cloud brightening offset “about 5 percent of climate warming from greenhouse gases”. But “ironically”, as stricter regulations have reduced ship pollution in recent years, that cloud brightening and greenhouse gas offset is fading away. Some scientists hope they can replicate the effect – with sea salt, rather than pollution.
Ultimately, “dimming the Sun” through techniques like cloud brightening “would not address the root cause of the climate disease”, said Peter Irvine, an earth sciences lecturer at University College London, on The Conversation. But more and more evidence “suggests that it would work surprisingly well at treating the symptoms”.
‘Tinkering with complex natural systems’
Geoengineering could be “crucial in the fight against climate change”, said Science. But if scientists want to continue getting projects off the ground, they “need to learn how to talk to the public about it”.
While some projects – like Aria’s in the UK and a successful cloud brightening project taking place over the Great Barrier Reef in Australia – have sped ahead, others have been squashed by a sceptical public.
The practice of artificially altering the planet’s natural systems “sounds ambitious, even arrogant. Perhaps inevitably it invites concerns about meddling with nature” and it “poses tricky questions” about how, when and where technology should be put to use.
It involves “tinkering with complex natural systems” that render it “irreversible” – and the proliferation of conspiracy theories and misinformation online are “partly behind moves to ban or restrict solar geoengineering”.
‘Like taking aspirin for cancer’
Though solar geoengineering treats some of the symptoms of climate change, it is a “barking mad scheme” that feels like “taking aspirin for cancer”, said American scientists Raymond Pierrehumbert and Michael Mann in The Guardian. If we become reliant on the technology, “the world will be left subject to a catastrophic termination shock” if the intervention ever ends.
The small scale of the trials is “little comfort” either, because “even small-scale trials risk developing the technology somebody else (think Musk, Trump or Putin) might use for a large-scale deployment”. And with a current lack of national or international governance to oversee geoengineering projects, “there is extreme danger” at play.
There are potential side effects of geoengineering techniques that still need to be examined, Sarah Doherty, an atmospheric scientist working on cloud brightening at the University of Washington, told The New York Times. Altering ocean circulation patterns could impact fisheries and cloud brightening could change precipitation patterns.
But “it’s vital to find out whether and how such technologies could work” just in case society needs them. “And no one can say when the world might reach that point.”
